A common charge made against the current political and cultural climate of the West — and a justified one — is that it is hostile to White men, particularly old (or dead) ones. While true, White women are also in the crosshairs.

In Europe, some of the most egregious crimes of multiculturalism have been committed against White women and girls who have been victims not only of terror attacks and anti-White stabbing sprees but also rape gangs populated mostly by Pakistani men.

Older White women who wish to maintain a functioning society are now branded as “Karens”. While hectoring and harpy-like female behaviour is often rightly criticised in White women, this meme grew in the main from a fecund soil of anti-White animus.

While the faults of White women can — and should — be the subject of good-natured dialogue, so should their positive traits.

Much is made of miscegenation among White women, with epithets like “mud shark” and “coal burner” directed at those who choose partners outside their race. However, White women are the most racially loyal when it comes to choosing a partner.

According to US data, mixed-race pairings now account for roughly 15% of all marriages in the country — up from 6.7% in 1980. However, White women are the least likely of all women in the US to miscegenate. Only 9% of White newlyweds marry outside their race compared to 17% of Blacks, 26% of Hispanics and 28% of Asians. Asian females are the most likely of all women to marry outside their race with 36.1% choosing a non-Asian partner. Interracial marriages involving a White female and a non-White male are most vulnerable to divorce after ten years [1].

Research on the preferences of internet daters shows that White women are less willing than White men to select a partner outside of their race [2]. Among White daters who express racial preferences, 64% of White women prefer to date only other Whites, compared to 29% of White men. White women are more likely than White men to exclude non-White racial groups, particularly Asians, Middle Easterners, and East Indians. White women overwhelmingly exclude Asian men as potential dates, a trait most likely due to their preference for masculinity in a male partner.

One common criticism of White women’s increasing participation in higher education is that this results in them choosing careers over marriage. However, some data show that from their mid-20s, White women with a bachelor's degree have higher marriage rates than White women with lower levels of education [3]. By their late 20s and early 30s, college-educated White women have the highest marriage rates, surpassing those of less-educated White women at any age. College-educated White women are now more likely to marry and stay married, while less-educated White women are experiencing declining marriage rates.

The data also show that among ever-married White women in their early 40s, those with the least education had a much lower likelihood of still being married compared to those with higher education (65.5% vs. 82.7%). This trend is relatively recent and reflects growing socioeconomic differences in divorce risk.

Other studies demonstrate that White women have relatively low levels of divorce. White women have a first divorce rate of 16.3 per 1,000, which is lower than that of African-American women (30.4 per 1,000) and of Hispanic women (18.1 per 1,000). Asian women had the lowest rate at 10 divorces per 1,000 women in a first marriage.

In respect to birth rates, although the total fertility rate for White women in the US remains below replacement, at 1.6 it is not significantly lower than that for Hispanic women (1.9) or Black women (1.7).

Birthrates for White women are closely associated with religiosity. One study found that White women who report that religion is “very important” in their daily lives have higher fertility rates than those who consider religion “somewhat important” or “not important” [4]. The total fertility rate for women who say religion is “very important” is 2.3 children per woman, compared to 2.1 for those who say religion is “somewhat important” and 1.8 for those who say religion is “not important”. This fertility differential is primarily driven by higher fertility intentions rather than factors like unwanted fertility or differences in fertility timing.

Women who consider religion “very important” intend to have 0.69 more children than non-religious women, and those who say religion is “somewhat important” intend 0.31 more children (controlling for other factors). The study attributes much of this fertility gap to more traditional gender and family attitudes among religious women. However, even after accounting for these attitudes, religiosity remains a strong predictor of higher intended fertility among White women.

White women who attend religious services tend to have higher fertility. Data show that monthly church attendance was associated with a 4% increase in total fertility and weekly attendance with a 7% increase [5]. Additionally, the study found that aid from co-religionists (alloparenting) was positively associated with fertility. White women who attended church weekly and received aid from co-religionists were expected to have 2.64 children over 10 years, compared to 2.36 children for women who did not receive such aid. In contrast, general social network support (not specific to religious groups) was negatively associated with fertility.

White women also have one of the lowest rates of infant mortality at 4.5 deaths per 1,000 live births. The rate for Black women is 10.6 and for Hispanic women 4.9.

Of course there are problems with White women — no one would deny that. But those who seek to scapegoat them for the ills of liberal democracy are falling for an anti-White trope.

Like White men, White women are victims of the current political system in Europe and America — victims both in flesh and in spirit. Instead of enforcing the dogmas of liberalism, the “cat ladies” and “wine aunts” would be enforcing pro-social and nationalist dogmas if these represented the dominant political paradigm. But they do not — a fault which should be laid at the feet of White men for allowing our society’s subversion by forces hostile to our existence.

The loss of religious community has been a disaster for European women and, consequently, our societies. A return to tradition is required — one in which men lead from the front and provide the conditions in which our women, and thus our race, can thrive.

[1] Bramlett, M.D., & Mosher, W.D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States. Vital Health Statistics Series, 22, 1-93.

[2] Feliciano, C., Robnett, B., & Komaie, G. (2009). Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters. Social Science Research, 38, 39-54.

[3] Raley, R.K., Sweeney, M.M., & Wondra, D. (2015). The growing racial and ethnic divide in U.S. marriage patterns. The Future of Children, 25(2), 89–109

[4] Hayford, S.R., & Morgan, S.P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the united states: the role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86(3), 1163–1188.

[5] Shaver, J.H., Power, E.A., Purzycki, B.G., Watts, J., Sear, R., Shenk, M. K., Sosis, R., & Bulbulia, J.A. (2020). Church attendance and alloparenting: an analysis of fertility, social support and child development among English mothers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1805), 20190428.